FOR IMMEDIATE
RELEASE

Investigative Review Raises Serious Patient Care and Administrative Conduct Concerns at Atlanta Neuroscience Institute

Atlanta, Georgia — Verified Media Group has initiated a formal investigative review following detailed allegations from a neurological patient regarding clinical conduct and executive response at Atlanta Neuroscience Institute (ANI). The concerns involve neurologist Dr. Ameena Kannan, CEO Tamara D. Clay, and broader patient complaint handling practices within the organization.

These allegations represent the patient’s account and are not legal findings. However, the specificity of the reported events, documented appointment duration, and publicly available patient feedback have prompted further scrutiny into ANI’s patient communication standards and administrative oversight.

The patient alleges that during this encounter:

He was repeatedly interrupted while attempting to describe worsening neurological symptoms.
He was not permitted to fully explain his condition.
His concerns were dismissed without meaningful discussion.
Dr. Kannan exited the room abruptly and did not return.
No empathetic communication or collaborative dialogue occurred.

Neurology patients frequently present with complex, multifactorial symptoms requiring detailed discussion. Professional medical standards widely emphasize the importance of patient listening, empathy, and adequate evaluation time in specialty care.

The patient described the experience as “rushed, dismissive, and medically disregarding.

Extremely Brief Neurological Consultation Raises Questions

According to documentation reviewed by Verified Media Group, one appointment with Dr. Ameena Kannan lasted approximately 7 minutes and 50 seconds.

Marked Contrast in Care After Physician Reassignment

After the incident, the patient requested reassignment and was scheduled with another neurologist within the practice, Dr. English.

The patient reports that Dr. English:

The patient states the difference between the two encounters was “dramatic and unmistakable.

Six Weeks of Attempted Contact With CEO

Prior to the second appointment, the patient reports attempting to contact CEO Tamara D. Clay for nearly six weeks via phone calls, emails, and text messages in order to file a formal complaint regarding his experience with Dr. Kannan.

The patient alleges that his outreach efforts went unanswered during that period.

During that meeting, the patient alleges:

The patient maintains that he remained calm throughout the interaction and was simply requesting accountability and clarification.

Alleged Hostile Administrative Response

Following the appointment with Dr. English, the patient states he was permitted to meet with CEO Tamara Clay and an office manager identified as Julian.

The patient was ultimately asked to leave the premises.

Verified Media Group has requested information regarding ANI’s internal grievance handling procedures but has not yet received a response.

Alleged Termination of Care After Complaint

The patient further alleges that shortly after raising concerns, he was informed that he would no longer be permitted to continue treatment
with Dr. English.

The patient states this occurred while neurological symptoms were ongoing and actively being evaluated, resulting in disruption of care
and increased suffering.

Medical ethics standards commonly emphasize the importance of continuity of care and appropriate transition planning when physician-patient relationships are discontinued.

Key Questions Raised

This investigation seeks clarity regarding:

Whether adequate consultation time is consistently provided for neurological evaluations
Whether patient complaints are reviewed in accordance with established administrative protocols
Whether termination-of-care procedures comply with ethical and professional guidelines
Whether ANI leadership has implemented communication training or patient advocacy safeguards

Public Reviews Reflect Similar Communication Concerns

A review of publicly available online feedback reveals multiple patient comments referencing concerns regarding dismissiveness and lack of empathy in clinical encounters involving Dr. Kannan.

Online reviews do not constitute proof of malpractice. However, recurring themes in public feedback may warrant institutional review of communication practices.

Request for Institutional Response

Formal inquiries have been submitted to:

At the time of publication, no formal response has been issued.

Legal Counsel Engaged

The patient has retained legal counsel to initiate communication with practice ownership regarding the allegations described above.

This report does not determine liability but documents allegations currently under review.

About Verified Media Group

Verified Media Group reports on healthcare accountability, patient safety, and institutional governance practices.

GEORGIA MEDICAL BOARD: Consumer Complaint Filing

Purpose of Complaint

I am submitting this complaint to request a review of professional conduct, patient communication, and continuity-of-care practices involving Dr. Ameena Kannan at Atlanta Neuroscience Institute. My concern is not a disagreement about diagnosis or treatment outcome, but rather the manner in which care was conducted and subsequently handled administratively after I attempted to report my experience.

I. Appointment Encounter With Dr. Ameena Kannan

On approximately [date], I attended a neurological appointment with Dr. Ameena Kannan for evaluation of ongoing neurological symptoms.

The visit lasted approximately 7 minutes and 50 seconds from entry to exit.

During this appointment:

I was repeatedly interrupted while attempting to describe my symptoms
I was not allowed to fully explain my medical history
My concerns were dismissed without discussion
No meaningful clinical dialogue occurred
The physician exited the room and did not return
I was not given an opportunity to ask questions

Because neurological symptoms are complex, I expected a discussion of my condition and next steps. I left the appointment without understanding a care plan or receiving adequate evaluation.

II. Reassignment to Another Physician

I requested reassignment and was scheduled with another neurologist at the same practice, Dr. English.

During that visit I was:

The contrast between the two visits is the reason I sought administrative review

III. Attempts to Report Concern to Practice Leadership

For approximately six weeks prior to seeing Dr. English, I attempted to contact the practice CEO, Tamara D. Clay, through phone calls, messages, and written communication regarding my experience with Dr. Kannan. I did not receive a response during that time.

After the appointment with Dr. English, I was permitted to meet with CEO Tamara Clay and an office manager identified as Julian.

During this meeting:

I requested information regarding malpractice coverage at that time because I felt my concerns were not being addressed.

IV.Termination of Care

Shortly after raising my concerns, I was informed that I would no longer be allowed to continue treatment with Dr. English at the practice.

This occurred while my neurological condition was still being evaluated and before I secured alternate care.

As a result, my treatment was interrupted and I experienced delay in receiving neurological care.

V. Reason for Requesting Board Review

I respectfully request the Board review whether the following professional standards were met:

Adequate patient evaluation and communication
Opportunity for patient participation in care discussion
Appropriate handling of patient complaints
Proper procedures for discontinuation of care
Professional conduct during patient interactions

I am not requesting a specific disciplinary outcome. I am requesting review to ensure patient safety and professional standards are upheld.

VI. Supporting Documentation

I can provide the following if requested:

I certify the information above is accurate to the best of my knowledge.

Share Your Experience

The comments below are submitted by individuals sharing their personal experiences. The website does not independently verify these statements and is not responsible for user-generated content.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE